Keene v. Blood
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
The first issue in the case is whether the installation of “combination units” in two of the rooms on the third floor of the premises violated-section 2 A (1) of the Keene zoning ordinance. This ordinance sets up a single-residence district and provides as follows: “No third floor shall be designated or occupied as an apartment, or used for cooking or other living purposes except for sleeping rooms . ”
No issue was raised by the parties as to whether the use of the first and second floors violated the ordinance and no issue was raised as to whether the prior use of hot-plates and coffee…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Evans v. RothSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Cedar Rapids Investment Co. v. Commodore Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Scanlan v. LaCosteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- New London v. LeskiewiczSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- New London Land Use Ass'n v. New London Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Flanagan v. Town of HollisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Peabody v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Town of Amherst v. CadoretteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.