Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Ford Motor Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 2017No. 104636PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, A.J.:

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Paul Heaton, individually and as executor of the Estate of Robert Brawley, appeals the trial court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, McCord Corporation. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In July 2011, Heaton filed a complaint against numerous defendants, including Honeywell International, Inc. and McCord. The complaint alleged various causes of action, including claims of strict products liability, negligence, supplier liability, failure to warn, and breach of warranties. The complaint related…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Lakewood v. PapadelisOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Jones v. HartranftOhio Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Kittis v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Lloyd v. Cleveland Clinic Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Dueck v. Clifton Park TrustOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Paulozzi v. RodstromOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API