Legal Opinion

Wentworth v. National Live Stock Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 11, 1910No. Nos. 16,249—(42)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Defendant appealed from a judgment in justice court to the municipal court of St. Paul. The proceedings in the justice and municipal ■courts are stated in the opinion. The order for judgment of affirm.ance was granted by Ilanft, J. Defendant’s motion for an order vacating the order affirming the judgment was denied by Einehout, -J. From the judgment of affirmance, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This action was commenced in justice court, where, in the due course of procedure, on October 5, 1908, judgment was rendered for plaintiffs for the amount claimed in the complaint. Whereupon defendant appealed to the municipal court of the city of St. Paul upon questions of both law and fact. The notice of appeal bears date October 13, and was upon that day, with proof of service indorsed thereon, together with the affidavit and bond on appeal, filed with the justice. Return was made by the justice to the municipal court, and on October 28 defendant’s counsel noticed the cause for trial in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. IgoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Christian v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Sundet v. SteenersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Christian v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Marcotte v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. IgoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Industrial Loan Thrift Corporation v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Spicer v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API