Legal Opinion

Pierzanowski v. Jezewski

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 31, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a bastardy action in which judgment was given for the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed. The finding of facts as made is ample to sustain the judgment and no correction can be made in it which would be of avail to the defendant. Bastardy proceedings are civil and not criminal in their nature, and the general rules respecting civil cases are applicable to them. Hamden v. Collins, 85 Conn. 327, 330, 82 Atl. 636. In an early opinion Hosmer, J., pointed out that the end of such proceedings is the redress of a civil injury, the purpose being to compel the father to pay certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hinman v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1817
  2. Robbins v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  3. Town of Hamden v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. ApuzzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Copes v. MalacarneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Terrasi v. AndrewsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
  4. State v. AngellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. In Re L.Connecticut Superior Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API