Houston v. Mayes
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Wilson. Tried below before Hon. W. H. Bust, Special District Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Associate Justice.
—R. C. Houston was administrator of *266the estate of Mary A. Mayes. In the year 1884 the administrator filed in the County Court an exhibit and asked for an allowance of §225 “for extra services.” The Probate Court refused to allow the claim for extra services, and the administrator appealed to the District Court. This cause was numbered 445 on the docket of the District Court.
In the year 1885 E. D. Mayes applied, in pursuance of the provisions of chapter 14 of the Revised Statutes, for the withdrawal of the estate from administration, and the required bond having .been…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Franks v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Richardson v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Drew v. JarvisTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Hare v. PendletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Arai v. SaenzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- McShan v. Lewis, AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Legrand v. StubblefieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.