United States v. Two Hundred Fifty-Four United States Twenty Dollar Gold Coins
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
Both plaintiff and claimant, Robert L. Rubin, move for summary judgment in this forfeiture proceeding. The plaintiff in its Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Forfeiture (hereinafter cited as plaintiff’s Brief) and the claimant in his Pre-Trial Statement (hereinafter cited as claimant’s Statement) concede there is'no issue of material fact.
On or about March 28, 1963, the claimant purchased the defendant coins in Canada and imported them into the United States through…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bell v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1981