Legal Opinion
United States v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 15, 1981No. Civ. A. C79-479APublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONTIE, District Judge.
Invoking the Court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio commenced the above captioned case for violations of the implementing regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Treasury under the authority of section 3 of the Gold Reserve Act of 1934, 1 48 Stat. 337. The Government alleges that defendant, through a wholly owned foreign subsidiary, acquired and held gold in violation of 31 C.F.R. § 54.14(a) (1974). 2
Prior to the filing of the Government’s complaint, Congress…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Federal Election Commission v. Larry R. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Robert E. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Advance MacHine Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
- United States v. Core Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. HuffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.