Legal Opinion
Jones v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 22, 2010No. 09-3282PublishedCited by 470 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIBBLER, District Judge.
JacWin Jones applied for disability benefits, but an administrative law judge denied her claim, reasoning that her testimony about her pain-induced functional limitations was not credible. The ALJ supported the credibility determination with references to the medical evidence, the opinions of treating physicians, and Jones’s daily activities. The district judge affirmed the ALJ’s decision, and Jones appeals. We affirm.
I
Jones claimed to become disabled beginning in November 2003 as a result of injuries she sustained in a 2001 motor vehicle accident. Jones had sought…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Craft v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Roberta Skinner v. Michael J. Astrue, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Terry v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Barbara Castile v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by470 opinions
- Rebecca Pepper v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Stephens v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Deborah Morgan v. Andrew SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Schomas v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Shauger v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
465 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.