Legal Opinion
State v. Hoven
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 21, 1978No. 47158PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
Defendant appeals from a conviction in a court trial1 for possession of controlled substances in violation of Minn.St. 152.01, 152.-02, 152.09, and 152.15. The conviction was based on evidence discovered in a search of defendant’s vehicle which had been im*851pounded after it was stopped and he was arrested on two outstanding traffic arrest warrants. Because we believe that these arrest warrants were used pretextually to permit the police to search defendant’s vehicle in which they expected to find illegal drugs, the evidence seized as a result of this illegal search must be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Abdon Delgadillo-VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- State v. BlairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. EverettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.