Little Falls Water-Power Co. v. Mahan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Henry Belin from an order of the district court for Morrison county, Searle, J., refusing to vacate its decision and denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtColrins, J.
This was an action to declare a forfeiture of a deed in which was a condition subsequent, and to eject defendants from the premises therein described. The defendant Belin alone answered, and he appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial, made after the court below, on a trial of the issues, had filed findings of fact, with its conclusions of law, that plaintiff was entitled to a judgment that it was the owner of the premises, was entitled to possession, and should recover the same, together with $300 damages for their detention.
The plaintiff was the grantor in the deed referred…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Minneapolis & St. Cloud Railroad v. Duluth & Winnipeg RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- Village of Hibbing v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Davidson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Consolidated School District No. 102 v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Seeck v. JakelOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- East Tennessee & W. N. C. R. v. GougeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.