Legal Opinion
Miracolo v. Daimler-Benz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 6, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a consolidated action to recover damages for products liability and medical malpractice, the defendants Daimler-Benz, A.G., Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. and Daimler-Benz of North America, Inc., purportedly appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated October 3, 1986, which precluded them from making inquiries as to when the plaintiff gave, a particular exhibit to her attorneys and which also precluded them from inquiring with respect to the condition of the plaintiff’s decedent prior to the alleged medical malpractice.
Ordered that the appeal is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sainz v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Roberts v. ModicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Rockwood National Corp. v. MarwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Ewell v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Scott v. Vassar Bros. HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robinson v. Pediatric Associates of Irwin AvenueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Bigman v. Dime Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988