Legal Opinion
Bigman v. Dime Savings Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 19, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to recover damages, inter alla, for defamation, tortious interference with business relations and tortious interference with contract, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), entered March 7, 1988, as inter alla, (1) granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to compel them to answer specified questions propounded at an examination before trial, (2) denied their cross motion requesting that the court supervise and limit the extent of the defendant’s discovery,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sainz v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Rockwood National Corp. v. MarwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Ewell v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Scott v. Vassar Bros. HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Eagle Star Insurance of America v. BeharAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kern v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Singh v. Villford Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005