Commonwealth v. Security Acceptance Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.
The defendants, Security Acceptance Corporation (Security) and Tilo Company, Inc. (Tilo) were indicted for violating G. L. c. 140, § 96. 2 The cases were consolidated for trial and submitted to a judge of the Superior Court on a statement of agreed facts. The judge, without decision, reported the cases for determination of certain issues of law.
We summarize the pertinent facts. On or about August 16,1961, Walter Holden, a sales representative of Tilo, contracted with John and Lillian Stallings for the sale of a composition type siding called “Duratex” to be applied to their home at a cash…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Uni-Serv Corp. of Mass. v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Skinner v. KapplesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Skinner v. CederbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murphy v. Charlestown Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Sliger v. RH MacY & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Household Finance Corp. v. VogelMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1970