Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Security Acceptance Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 3, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.

The defendants, Security Acceptance Corporation (Security) and Tilo Company, Inc. (Tilo) were indicted for violating G. L. c. 140, § 96. 2 The cases were consolidated for trial and submitted to a judge of the Superior Court on a statement of agreed facts. The judge, without decision, reported the cases for determination of certain issues of law.

We summarize the pertinent facts. On or about August 16,1961, Walter Holden, a sales representative of Tilo, contracted with John and Lillian Stallings for the sale of a composition type siding called “Duratex” to be applied to their home at a cash…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Uni-Serv Corp. of Mass. v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Skinner v. KapplesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Skinner v. CederbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Charlestown Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Sliger v. RH MacY & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. Household Finance Corp. v. VogelMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API