Legal Opinion
Martin v. Pond
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
Decided February 15, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
This is a bill to redeem from a mortgage. The facts are these: Prior to November, 1873, R. J. Mendenhall owned the land in controversy, being a tract of 10 acres in the city of Minneapolis. On *16November 21, 1873, he conveyed it, by deed absolute in form, to Peter Wolford. This conveyance was in fact simply as security for debts due from Mendenhall to Wolford, amounting to $12,000 or thereabouts. It was duly recorded December 8, 1873. On December 14, 1875, Wol-ford, to sedhre a loan of $12,500 then made by defendant Pond to Mendenhall, executed to said Pond a warranty deed of the land. This…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Jackson v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- Parsons v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Oxley State Co. v. Coopers' International Union of North AmericaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Arkansas · 1896
- Hopeful, a Wyoming partnership consisting of Edward F. Murray, Jr., Donald F. Murray, William M. Murray, Mary Ann Kulas f/k/a Mary Ann Hollis, and Ted Simola Hopeful Ltd., a Wyoming partnership consisting of Edward F. Murray, Jr., Donald F. Murray, William M. Murray, Mary Ann Hollis, and Ted Simola and Ted Simola, an individual v. Etchepare, L.L.C., a Wyoming limited liability company Ned Murray Co., a Wyoming partnership GBK Investments, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company and EOG Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Dickerman Investment Co. v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Dorian v. DorianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.