Legal Opinion

Makowiecki v. Sturm, Ruger, Smith & Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 17, 1987No. 86-1266Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEHAN, Judge.

The plaintiff in this personal injury products liability suit appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant. The injury was allegedly caused by a defective gun manufactured by defendant. The basis for the summary judgment was that the suit was barred by the statute of repose, section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes (1985), because the gun was delivered to its original purchaser more than twelve years before the suit was filed. That statute provided in relevant part that “Actions for products liability ... must be begun ... within 12 years after the date of delivery of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Shaw v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. American Liberty Ins. Co. v. West and ConyersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Pait v. Ford Motor Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API