Legal Opinion

Matamoros v. Tovbin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*942Initially, the Supreme Court properly considered the merits of the plaintiffs motion and the defendant Eduardo M. Cornejo’s cross motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants Rajiv R. Mody and Rufino Rodriguez on the issue of liability and for a new trial. The parties’ so-called “high-low” agreement did not expressly prohibit the making of the subject postverdict motion and cross motion (see Doubrovinskaya v Dembitzer, 77 AD3d 609, 610 [2010]; Grochowski v Fudella, 70 AD3d 1407, 1408 [2010]; Cunha v Shapiro, 42 AD3d 95, 100 [2007]).

However, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Torrado v. Lutheran Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Cunha v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Vingo v. RosnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Doubrovinskaya v. DembitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Grochowski v. FudellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Amorosi v. HubbardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. AMOROSI, MARY v. HUBBARD, SARAHAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Amorosi v. HubbardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Salov v. AkinjideAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  5. Searcy v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API