Legal Opinion
Banks v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 30, 2015No. 99-4451L (consolidated with, 99-4452 L, 99-4453 L, 99-4454 L, 99-4455 L, 99-4456 L, 99-4457 L, 99-4458 L, 99-4459 L, 99-44510 L, 99-44511 L, 99-44512 L, 00-365 L, 00-379 L, 00-380 L, 00-381 L, 00-382 L, 00-383 L, 00-384 L, 00-385 L, 00-386 L, 00-387 L, 00-388 L, 00-389 L, 00-390 L, 00-391 L, 00-392 L, 00-393 L, 00-394 L, 00-395 L, 00-396 L, 00-398 L, 00-399 L, 00-400 L, 00-401 L, 05-1353 L, 05-1381 L, 06-072 L)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Mandate Interpretation; Claim Accrual Principles in Takings Cases Involving Gradual Physical Processes; “Permanent” Nature of Taking in Determining Claim Accrual; Factual Findings Presented in the Alternative
OPINION AND ORDER
CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge
The purpose of this Opinion and Order is to address and resolve the initial issues raised by plaintiffs in light of the Federal Circuit’s mandate in Banks v. United States (“Banks IV”), 741 F.3d 1268, 1283 (Fed.Cir.2014), Dkt. No. 508, which reversed this court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims for lack of jurisdiction in Banks v. United States…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Paktin Construction Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021