Legal Opinion

In Re Grant

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1982No. 54243PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

In these consolidated disciplinary proceedings the Review Board of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission has recommended that respondent, Arthur H. Grant, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years and until further order of the court. The matter is before us on respondent’s exceptions to that recommendation.

Separate complaints were filed by the Administrator and heard by separate panels. The first complaint, filed on December 19, 1978, charged respondent in separate counts with the commingling and wrongful conversion of client funds belonging to Edward…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re ClayterIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re O'HallarenIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re BrodyIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re BloomIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re CheronisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Plambeck v. Greystone Management & Columbia National Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API