Legal Opinion

Holsapple v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided October 31, 2003No. Record 030334PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENIOR JUSTICE CARRICO

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Code § 18.2-200.1 provides in pertinent part as follows:

If any person obtain from another an advance of money, . . . with fraudulent intent, upon a promise to perform construction ... of any building or structure permanently annexed to real property . . . and fail or refuse to perform such promise, and also fail to substantially make good such advance, he shall be deemed guilty of the larceny of such money ... if he fails to return such advance within fifteen days of a request to do so sent by certified mail, return receipt requested,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Barr v. Town & Country Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  3. Brown v. LukhardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  4. Jimenez v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  5. Snyder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Bowman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2015
  2. Washington v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. Jackson v. Fidelity and Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Evans v. EvansSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  5. VIRGINIAN-PILOT MEDIA v. Dow Jones & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API