K. H. v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
27 P.3d 130 (2001)
174 Or. App. 262
K.H., Respondent,
v.
William Andrew MITCHELL, Appellant.
99DO0770ST; A108441.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted August 1, 2000.
Decided May 9, 2001.
Charles F. Lee argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Lee & Kaser.
No appearance for respondent.
Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.
KISTLER, J.
Respondent appeals from a permanent stalking protective order restraining him from contacting petitioner.[1] Although respondent's actions warranted the issuance of a stalking protective order, the scope of the order…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RangelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- K. H. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.