Legal Opinion

K. H. v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 9, 2001No. 99DO0770ST; A108441Published

1Opinion of the Court

27 P.3d 130 (2001)

174 Or. App. 262

K.H., Respondent,

v.

William Andrew MITCHELL, Appellant.

99DO0770ST; A108441.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted August 1, 2000.

Decided May 9, 2001.

Charles F. Lee argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Lee & Kaser.

No appearance for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

KISTLER, J.

Respondent appeals from a permanent stalking protective order restraining him from contacting petitioner.[1] Although respondent's actions warranted the issuance of a stalking protective order, the scope of the order…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Martin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. RangelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. K. H. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API