Legal Opinion

Martin v. Martin, Martin & Richards, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1999No. 97-0795PublishedCited by 225 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary question presented is whether a dismissal with prejudice of a suit to declare a contract valid bars an action for a breach occurring after the dismissal. In the circumstances of this case, we answer no, contrary to the court of appeals, 1 and therefore reverse and remand the case to that court for further proceedings.

Gary Martin sold his stock in Martin, Martin & Richards, Inc. to its other two shareholders, Roneal Martin and Floyd Richards. Under their written contract (“the contract”), Gary was to be paid $200,000 for his interest in MMR and $1.3 million for consulting services.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cowling v. ColliganTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gulf Coast Investment Corp. v. NASA 1 Business CenterTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Marino v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. City of Lubbock v. StubbsTexas Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by225 opinions

  1. Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Michiana Easy Livin' Country, Inc. v. HoltenTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Co. v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Texas Integrated Conveyor Systems, Inc. v. Innovative Conveyor Concepts, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  5. Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API