UNECO, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dev. Corp.

Plaintiff is a subcontractor. In the first cause of action of the amended complaint, a money judgment is demanded against the original contractor. The second cause of action requests the foreclosure of a me*59chanic’s lien against the owner of the premises upon which material and labor were expended. The owner, by answer, alleges that the lien is defective for the reason that the plaintiff “failed to make ont, furnish, or serve the statement under oath and certificates in the form as set forth in and required by Section 1311.04 of the Ohio Revised Code,” and asks that the lien be cancelled. In…