State v. Caha
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
The defendant was convicted in the district court for Douglas County of the crime of statutory rape and sentenced to a term of imprisonment. The defendant has appealed.
There is no contention that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. In fact, there is little dispute in the facts except that defendant asserts that the prosecutrix, a girl of the age of 14 years, voluntarily participated and that there was no penetration. Whether or not the prosecutrix voluntarily participated is not a material issue, in the case. Whether or not there was penetration is a material issue on which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Mulder v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cummings v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Shaffer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. LewisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- State v. BohananSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State v. MattanNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.