Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Goodrich

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

General Assumpsit. Pleas, general issue, Statute of Limitations and set-off. Heard on the report of a referee, December • Term, 1882, Taft, J., presiding. Judgment for the defendant. One item of $ 1.50 allowed by the referee to the plaintiff was dated April 12th, 1873. The other facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Yeazey, J.

The action is general assumpsit and was referred. The parties had mutual deal and accounts. The plaintiff’s specifications consist of book charges covering a period from 1852 to 1874. The defendant filed a plea in offset and presented specifications consisting of. charges from 1852 to September, 1858, and *355also pleaded the Statute of Limitations. The plaintiff’s account was barred except possibly one item, unless saved by a credit allowed by the referee subject to the opinion of the court upon the facts reported.

The referee reports that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1875
  2. Hodge v. ManleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
  3. Day v. LambSupreme Court of Vermont · 1835
  4. Abbott v. KeithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
  5. Allen v. MannSupreme Court of Vermont · 1797

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  2. Day v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Bates v. SabinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  4. United States v. American Lumber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
  5. Jacques v. JacquesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API