Legal Opinion
United States v. Central State Bank State Savings Bank Harry C. Calcutt, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1987No. 85-1832PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant the United States of America (the government) appealed from the judgment for defendants Central State Bank (Central), State Savings Bank (State) and Harry C. Calcutt (Calcutt) in this antitrust action initiated pursuant to Section 1 et seq. of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
Calcutt was the president, chairman of the board and majority shareholder of State, a small, state-chartered bank located in the town of Frankfort in Benzie County, Michigan. State was a full service banking institution offering a wide range of deposit accounts (including various certificates of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Westman Commission Company, Cross-Appellant v. Hobart International, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Central State BankDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- McWane, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Virtual Maintenance, Inc. v. Prime Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Virtual Maintenance, Inc. v. Prime Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Virtual Maintenance, Inc. v. Prime Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993