Legal Opinion
Barron v. Social Security Administration
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 13, 2025No. 6:23-cv-00378Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ROJELIO BARRON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-23-378-GLJ ) MICHELLE KING,1 ) Acting Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Claimant Rojelio Barron requests judicial review of a denial of benefits by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). He appeals the Commissioner’s decision and asserts that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred in determining he was not disabled. For the reasons discussed below, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Danny CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.