Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Dumas

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 1, 2001No. 00-1411PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellees David M. Dumas and Donnie S. Dumas (the Dumases) move this court to dismiss the appeal of appellants Robert Murphy, Cathy Murphy, and others (the Murphys) due to a late filing of the record on appeal in violation of Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 5(a). We agree that the trial court erred in granting the extension of time, but we deny the motion to dismiss.

The facts are that on July 28, 2000, the Murphys timely filed their notice of appeal from a decree quieting title to certain land entered on June 29, 2000. This meant that under Appellate Rule 5(a) the record had to be filed by October 26,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cole v. First Nat. Bank of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Alexander v. BeaumontSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. King v. CarneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Jacobs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Harper v. PearsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coggins v. CogginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Rose Care, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Camp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Hickson v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Holloway v. Arkansas State Board of ArchitectsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API