Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard W. Emens
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 14, 1977No. 76-1946PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAST, District Judge:
Superseding Indictment and Proceedings in the District Court:
Richard W. Emens, John L. Ribando, Charles Rodgers, George M. Challmun, III, David R. Lugo, Steven W. Smith, Marcia L. Browne, Dennis W. Latter, Phillip S. Mosk-ios, Frank J. Maybusher, Gary E. Smedley, and Kenneth R. Bennett (Appellees) were indicted under a superseding indictment for violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 963 and 846 (conspiracy to import and possess marijuana); 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (possession of marijuana with intent to distribute); and 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) (importation of marijuana)!
The Appellees moved…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Forman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Bruce Dunn, Richard Austin Mandeville, Joseph Harvey Zeligs, Darold Lanier Milligan, Richard Lee ShinafeltCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Henderson v. Carbondale Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. RubioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Jerome Gatto, Virgil Redmond, Joseph Bonanno, Jr., and Salvatore BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Frank J. MaybusherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. John Richard HumphriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Franke Eugenio MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.