Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Perdue
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRIA, Judge.
Both parties appeal the trial court’s order which invalidated N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-306.4(a)(3)(i) as unconstitutionally overbroad and upheld the constitutionality of the remainder of that statute. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. Background
Plaintiff Hest Technologies, Inc. (“Hest”) is a Texas corporation authorized to transact business in North Carolina. Plaintiff International Internet Technologies, LLC (“IIT”) is an Oklahoma corporation also authorized to transact business in North Carolina. Hest and IIT (collectively “plaintiffs”) sell long-distance telephone time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Animal Protection Society of Durham, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. MelloCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State ex rel. PerdueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- Hest Technologies, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. PerdueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- United States v. $115,413.00 In US CurrencyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025