Legal Opinion

Moore v. Cormode

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1898No. 3123PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, G-arfield County.—Hon. Thomas H. Brents, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*310The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, C. J.

The land in controversy in this case is within the indemnity limits of the grant to the Northern Pacific Bailroad Company. In 1882 one Mrs. Standifird, a qualified settler, located ilpon the land, built a house and made other improvements, and the defendant, Cor-mode, by mesne conveyances, succeeded to her rights, and now holds under homestead patent. The appellant is the grantee' of the railroad company, and brought this action to cancel the patent issued to the respondent and to obtain possession of the land. A demurrer interposed by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Johnson v. DrewSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. ColburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Gale v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. New Dunderberg Min. Co. v. OldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oden Const. Co. v. HELTONMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Southern Pacific Railroad v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. SprayWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Gray's Harbor Co. v. DrummWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Howard v. HibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API