Legal Opinion

Guilmette v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 21, 1975No. 73-285-AppealPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelleher, J.

This is an employer’s appeal from a decree of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission affirming a decree of the trial commissioner which awarded the employee benefits for total incapacity. Hereinafter, we shall refer to the employer as “Humble Oil” and the employee as “Guilmette.”

Guilmette worked for Humble Oil as the manager and mechanic at a service station located in Hopkinton, Rhode Island. On November 25, 1971, Guilmette slipped and fell on some slush that had accumulated on the floor in the office portion of the station. The physicians who have either treated or examined Giulmette are in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. VeseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  2. Geigy Chemical Corp. v. ZuckermanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  3. Rockford Clutch Division v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Rosa v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1948
  5. Cranston Print Works v. PascatoreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Patrizia Prew v. Employee Retirement System of the City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  2. Tavares v. Aramark Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  3. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Paul Ellis v. Verizon New England, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. Dawson v. a & H MFG. CO.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API