Legal Opinion

In Re Paternity of KH

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1999No. 45A03-9809-JV-385PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

709 N.E.2d 1033 (1999)

In the Matter of the PATERNITY OF K. H.,

Miriam Nash, Guardian of K. H., Appellant-Respondent,

v.

Richard Howell, Appellee-Petitioner.

No. 45A03-9809-JV-385.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

March 31, 1999.

Duane W. Hartman, Blachly, Tabor, Bozik & Hartman, Valparaiso, Indiana, Attorney for Appellant.

John A. Demato, John A. DeMato & Associates, Hammond, Indiana, Attorney for Appellee.

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant-Respondent, Miriam Nash, ("Nash"), Guardian of K.H., appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of Richard Howell, III ("Richard"), on his petition to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of MoserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Paternity of T.C.S. ex rel. State, Department of Public Welfare v. EllisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Nash v. HowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. PHICO Insurance v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  3. Hutchinson v. SpaniermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Cooper Industries, LLC v. City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Drake v. McKinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API