Legal Opinion

Drake v. McKinney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1999No. 27A05-9904-JV-150PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOK, Judge.

Case Summary

Timothy Drake (“Drake”) appeals from the juvenile court’s dismissal of his petition to establish paternity. We reverse and remand.

Issues

The sole issue presented by Drake is whether the juvenile court erred in dismissing his motion to establish paternity.

Facts and Procedural History

The facts most favorable to Drake as the non-movant reveal that both he and the respondent, Olissia Queen McKinney (“McKinney”), admit that Drake is the biological father of a child (“the child”) born to McKinney on August 11, 1993; both parties signed an affidavit of paternity at the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of MoserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. O. S. v. J. M.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. In Re Paternity of KHIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Van Santen v. TreeceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Paternity of BNCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Farmer v. SpradlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API