Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Garnand

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 26, 1972No. 1 CA-CIV 1553PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Chief Judge,

Division 1.

On this appeal from a judgment resulting from a jury verdict for the defendantappellees (hereinafter “defendant”), the plaintiff-appellants (hereinafter “plaintiff”) contend that the trial judge committed error in the admission of evidence and in the giving of instructions to the jury concerning certain “custom” evidence.

The litigation arose out of a rather peculiar factual setting involving an automobile collision in a left-turn lane situated on Thomas Road in the City of Phoenix, Arizona. Both automobiles were traveling in an easterly direction prior to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Heimke v. MunozArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Langner v. CavinessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. WusichArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Cherry v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Contempo Construction Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  2. State Mechanical, Inc. v. Liquid Air, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Contempo Const. v. MT. STATES T. & T. CO.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API