Legal Opinion

State v. Cornwall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1976No. 1 CA-CR 1582PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OGG, Judge.

The appellant/defendant James H. Corn-well, pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, entered a plea of guilty to three counts of fraud in the purchase or sale of securities. *503The defendant now appeals from the judgments and sentences imposed on the three counts, setting forth three questions to be determined by this court:

1. The defendant’s guilty pleas were not properly accepted because the court failed to comply with 17 ARS Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 17.4;

2. The court erred in not allowing the defendant to withdraw his guilty pleas;

3. The court erred in denying the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. McKessonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. CornwallArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. City CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API