Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 2020No. 118673PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS Nos. 118,673 118,674 118,675 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. KEVIN COIL COLEMAN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law over which appellate courts have unlimited review. 2. Generally, a statute operates prospectively unless there is clear language indicating the Legislature intended it to operate retrospectively. Review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion filed December 14, 2018. Appeal from Saline District Court; RENE S. YOUNG, judge. Opinion filed April 10, 2020. Judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Brennan v. Kansas Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  3. State v. HurleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  5. State v. BattleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. TafollaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. DominguezCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API