Legal Opinion

State v. Dominguez

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 28, 2020No. 121618PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No. 121,618 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ANDREA MARIE DOMINGUEZ, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court exercises unlimited review when interpreting a sentencing statute. 2. Generally, a statutory change operates prospectively except (1) when its language clearly shows that the Legislature intended retroactive application, or (2) when the statutory change is merely procedural or remedial in nature and does not prejudicially affect a party's substantive rights. 3. The 2019 amendment to the intermediate sanctioning scheme at K.S.A.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  3. State v. HirshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. State v. ClappSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. State v. Gonzalez-SandovalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  2. State v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  4. State v. KillmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  5. State v. McRobertsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API