Whipple v. Miner
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtLowell, J.
The complainant alleges that he was the first inventor of a certain improvement in horseshoe nails; that he applied for a patent for the improvement, and, pending his application, the defendant Miner made a similar application, and, upon an interference, the office decided in favor of Miner, and is about to issue to him a patent. The hill prays that the complainant “may he adjudged to be entitled, according to law, to receive a patent for his invention,” as provided by Eev. St. § 4915, and that the defendant Miner may be restrained in the mean time from receiving his patent.
I adhere to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Union Paper-Bag Mach. Co. v. CraneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1874
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kappos v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Hyatt v. KapposCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Lucke v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
- Bernardin v. NorthallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897
- Covert v. CovertU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.