Legal Opinion

Whipple v. Miner

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 2, 1883PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtLowell, J.

The complainant alleges that he was the first inventor of a certain improvement in horseshoe nails; that he applied for a patent for the improvement, and, pending his application, the defendant Miner made a similar application, and, upon an interference, the office decided in favor of Miner, and is about to issue to him a patent. The hill prays that the complainant “may he adjudged to be entitled, according to law, to receive a patent for his invention,” as provided by Eev. St. § 4915, and that the defendant Miner may be restrained in the mean time from receiving his patent.

I adhere to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Union Paper-Bag Mach. Co. v. CraneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1874

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kappos v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Hyatt v. KapposCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Lucke v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  4. Bernardin v. NorthallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897
  5. Covert v. CovertU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API