Legal Opinion

Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1995No. A95A0465 to A95A0470PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company, a Delaware corporation, and Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company, a New York partnership in which the Delaware corporation is a general partner, (referred to as UGTC *249unless otherwise necessary) appeal from judgments entered against them in these product liability cases, including $25 million in punitive damages.

This case had its genesis in a wreck in August 1989 involving the Fords’ 1982 van which was equipped with UGTC-produced tires. Mrs. Ford, Jr. had originally purchased two new SP-7000 tires from NTW, also named as a defendant, in February 1988.…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Birdsong; Concurrence · Birdsong.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. StubblefieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. ConkleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  5. Mattox v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Powertel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Ford v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  5. Rose v. Figgie International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API