Kehl v. Kehl
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The parties agree that the oral statement of the court operated as a valid judgment of divorce, under the rule of Zahorka v. Geith, 129 Wis. 498, 109 N. W. 552, wherein it was held that an oral announcement from the bench that a divorce was granted so operated without anything further being done in the matter. They differ, however, as to the kind of divorce that was granted. The appellants claim it is a divorce a vinculo; the respondent that it is a divorce from bed and board. The appellants concede that if it is a divorce from bed and board, Mrs. Kehl is the lawful widow of the deceased and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fleenor v. DriskillIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Clay v. Hildebrand Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Fowler v. DoyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Zahorka v. GeithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Succession of DurnfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yost v. YostNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- Sang v. SangWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Rohloff v. RohloffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Hooker v. HookerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.