Legal Opinion

Kehl v. Kehl

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The parties agree that the oral statement of the court operated as a valid judgment of divorce, under the rule of Zahorka v. Geith, 129 Wis. 498, 109 N. W. 552, wherein it was held that an oral announcement from the bench that a divorce was granted so operated without anything further being done in the matter. They differ, however, as to the kind of divorce that was granted. The appellants claim it is a divorce a vinculo; the respondent that it is a divorce from bed and board. The appellants concede that if it is a divorce from bed and board, Mrs. Kehl is the lawful widow of the deceased and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fleenor v. DriskillIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Clay v. Hildebrand Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Fowler v. DoyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Zahorka v. GeithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Succession of DurnfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yost v. YostNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sang v. SangWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Rohloff v. RohloffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hooker v. HookerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API