Legal Opinion
Baublit v. Barr & Riddle Engineering Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 1989No. WD 40846PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
The Baublit’s petition asking for damages for the negligence of the defendant Barr & Riddle Engineering in preparing a survey, fell to the engineering company’s motion for summary judgment. At issue is the loss of a strip of land which contains a well which was thought by the Baublits to be on their property, but because of the *234survey was lost by them to an adjoining landowner. The respondents motion alleged the applicable five year statute of limitations, § 516.120, RSMo 1986 had run, and also asked for judgment because the Baublits lacked standing.
The trial court dismissed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Edgar v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- 1ST AMERICAN TITLE INS. v. 1st Title Serv. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guardian Construction Co. v. Tetra Tech Richardson, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1990
- Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. v. Tri-Lakes Title Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mark Twain Kansas City Bank v. Jackson, Brouillette, Pohl & Kirley, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Vickers v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Gipson v. SlagleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.