Legal Opinion

Gipson v. Slagle

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1991No. WD 44116PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

Barry and Cheryl Gipson appeal from the trial court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted in their action against C. Dexter Slagle. The Gipsons alleged that Slagle was grossly negligent in his preparation of a survey. Gipsons present two points on appeal: (1) that the trial court erred in granting Sla-gle’s motion to dismiss because their petition states a cause of action in negligence per se as the Gipsons are within the class of persons intended to be protected by 4 CSR 30-8.020; and (2) that the trial court erred in granting Slagle’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Edgar v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Westerhold v. CarrollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Duncan v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Lowdermilk v. Vescovo Building & Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Burns v. Black & Veatch Architects, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Mid-Missouri Limestone, Inc. v. County of CallawayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Mediq PRN Life Support Services, Inc. v. AbramsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API