Politte v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge
Introduction
Nathan Politte (“Politte”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his amended Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief on the merits. Lacking a sufficient record to determine the timeliness of Politte’s amended motion, we reverse and remand.
Factual and Procedural History
The State charged Politte with three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy. Under a plea agreement, Politte pleaded guilty to one of those counts, and the State dismissed the other two.
Acting pro se, Politte timely filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court appointed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- Austin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Craigg v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
3Cited by3 opinions
- Greer v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- BILLIE J. BORSCHNACK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- Robert M. Tinsley, Sr. v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022