Legal Opinion

People v. Schaletzke

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1966No. Crim. 10441PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRUCKER, J. pro tem,. *

Defendant bases his appeal from the judgment on the grounds that the court did not fulfill its duty when it sentenced the defendant to state prison instead of committing him to the state hospital pursuant to sections 5512 and 5518 of the Welfare and Institutions Code; and that such commitment to prison without treatment of a mentally disordered sex offender inflicts cruel and unusual punishment and deprives defendant of equal protection and due process of law.

A plea of guilty to violation of section 288, Penal Code, was entered by defendant. The issue of a prior…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. People v. McCrackenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. HectorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. SaffellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. KirkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. OglesbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. MaughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. ResendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API