Legal Opinion

Dimondstein v. Stidman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 18, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2019-2474Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK DIMONDSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-2474 (TJK) JERRY STIDMAN et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Mark Dimondstein, President of the American Postal Workers Union (APWU), asserts libel claims against Defendants Jerry Stidman and Jonathan Kelley, two APWU members and—Dimondstein alleges—longstanding critics of his leadership. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to transfer or, in the alternative, to dismiss the case for improper venue and lack of personal jurisdiction. ECF No. 8. For the reasons explained…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Naartex Consulting Corporation, Russell Huff v. James G. Watt, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API