Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Warren

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1950No. Civ. No. 4037PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, Acting P. J.

Petitioner, Oral L. Mitchell, as a taxpayer and legally qualified voter of the 35th assembly district, instituted this proceeding to compel the Honorable Earl Warren, as Governor of the State of California, to call an election in that district for the purpose of electing a successor to the late Samuel L. Heisinger. Heisinger was duly elected assemblyman of the 35th district in 1948, and died on September 21, 1949, during his term of office. This office has been vacant ever since said date and no election has been called by the governor to fill said vacancy.

It is alleged in the verified…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Putnam v. NorbladOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Atkins v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People ex rel. Bacon v. CullomIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. State ex rel. Cromelien v. BoydNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Weiss v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bruce v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Stinson v. BlodgetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API