Legal Opinion
Goldman & Masur v. Goldman
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 7, 1899No. 12,875PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOn application for rehearing by Breaux, J.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Nicholes, 0. J.
It is represented in the petition, that on the 14th of January, 1894, Goldman & Masur, a commercial firm, composed of Simon Goldman and David Masur, both residents of the city of Monroe, parish of Ouachita, in this State, purchased from L. H. Goldman a stock of goods in the city of Monroe, and the good will of the business of selling goods, boots, shoes, notions, etc., carried on by L. EL Goldman in that city.
In order to protect and secure the good will so purchased, L. BL Goldman executed and filed a written obligation to pay the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bagley v. . PeddieNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Cushing v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Welch Al. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
- Streeter v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Riley v. WaughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1851
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barnes v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Eugene Dietzgen Co. v. KokoskySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- M. M. Ullman & Co. v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931