Legal Opinion

Uryevick v. Rozzi

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 1, 1990No. CV 88-2060, CV 88-2196PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

MISHLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Anthony Uryevick and Arthur Wickers, former police officers of the Nassau County Police Department, bring these consolidated actions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1988 against the Police Department, the Commissioner thereof (the “Commissioner”) and Nassau County, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged deprivation of their federal constitutional rights. Plaintiffs attack the constitutionality and application of the Rules and Regulations of the Police Department and Collective Bargaining Agreement…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fred Taylor v. City of ShreveportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Cassidy v. ScoppettaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  3. King v. MacRiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  4. Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  5. Rucci v. ThoubboronDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API