Legal Opinion
Anthony Gant v. Daniel Hartman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 14, 2019No. 18-1287PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hamilton, Circuit Judge.
Anthony Gant brought this action against three police officers and the City of Fort Wayne for injuries he sustained as he fled from an armed robbery. Gant's operative First Amended Complaint alleges several constitutional violations and seeks damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The defendants moved for summary judgment, asserting claims of qualified immunity for Officers Daniel Hartman, Bradley Griffin, and Jason Palm.
The district court granted summary judgment for all defendants except Officer Hartman, who Gant alleges violated his Fourth Amendment rights by using…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Plumhoff v. RickardSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Julian J. Miller v. Albert GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Shawn Eagan v. Michael DempseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Jeffrey Leiser v. Karen KlothCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Jerry Smith, Jr. v. Melvin FinkleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Percy Taylor v. Joseph WaysCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- Hyung Koh v. Sung KimCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.