Legal Opinion

Huff v. Omaha Cold Storage Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1939No. 30717PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is a compensation case, involving section 48-142, Comp. St. 1929, as amended (Laws 1935, ch. 57, sec. 27), which reads in part as follows: “(b) If the parties cannot agree, then at any time after six months from the date of the agreement or award, an application may be made by either party on the ground of increase or decrease of incapacity due solely to the injury.”' The question to be determined is whether or not the plaintiff suffered an increase of incapacity due solely to the injury.

It is not disputed that the plaintiff, on February 21, 1934, sustained an accident arising out of and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Globe Indemnity Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Hull v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Carlson v. Condon-Kiewit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Connelly v. Carnegie Dock & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Wingate v. Evans Model LaundryNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Big Horn County v. IlesWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Haler v. Gering Bean CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ludwickson v. Central States Electric Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Peek v. Ayers Auto SupplyNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Chadd v. Western Casualty & Surety CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API